LURAM: Difference between revisions
From Book of Mormon Onomasticon
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
Most unlikely is Sumerian ''lu'' “man” plus Akkadian ''rām'' “exalted,” because ancient Near Eastern onomasticon did not mix languages. The biblical PN Ram ([http://scriptures.lds.org/en/ruth/4/19#19 Ruth 4:19]; [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/1_chr/2/9#9 1 Chronicles 2:9]; [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/job/32/2#2 Job 32:2]) does come from “exalted,” as does the last part of [[ABRAHAM|A<small>BRAHAM</small>]]’s former name. But given this possibility, the ''lu''- must be accounted for, and it cannot be the | Most unlikely is Sumerian ''lu'' “man” plus Akkadian ''rām'' “exalted,” because ancient Near Eastern onomasticon did not mix languages. The biblical PN Ram ([http://scriptures.lds.org/en/ruth/4/19#19 Ruth 4:19]; [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/1_chr/2/9#9 1 Chronicles 2:9]; [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/job/32/2#2 Job 32:2]) does come from “exalted,” as does the last part of [[ABRAHAM|A<small>BRAHAM</small>]]’s former name. But given this possibility, the ''lu''- must be accounted for, and it cannot be the | ||
preposition “to, for,” because of the vowel quality. If the verbal root were conjugated in the imperfect, the ''lu''- might be the assertive particle “surely” giving the meaning “ | preposition “to, for,” because of the vowel quality. If the verbal root were conjugated in the imperfect, the ''lu''- might be the assertive particle “surely” giving the meaning “ | ||
[He is] surely exalted” (JAT). | [He is] surely exalted” ([[John A. Tvedtnes|JAT]]). | ||
See also [[Luram / Laram Variants]] | See also [[Luram / Laram Variants]] | ||
Revision as of 16:20, 2 November 2012
| Lehite PN | 1. | Soldier, 4th c. AD (Moroni 9:2) |
This entry is not finished
Etymology
No etymology is suggested.
Most unlikely is Sumerian lu “man” plus Akkadian rām “exalted,” because ancient Near Eastern onomasticon did not mix languages. The biblical PN Ram (Ruth 4:19; 1 Chronicles 2:9; Job 32:2) does come from “exalted,” as does the last part of ABRAHAM’s former name. But given this possibility, the lu- must be accounted for, and it cannot be the preposition “to, for,” because of the vowel quality. If the verbal root were conjugated in the imperfect, the lu- might be the assertive particle “surely” giving the meaning “ [He is] surely exalted” (JAT).
See also Luram / Laram Variants
Variants
Deseret Alphabet:
Notes
