LURAM: Difference between revisions
From Book of Mormon Onomasticon
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
Lehite PN | |Lehite PN | ||
|Soldier, 4th c. AD (Moroni 9:2) | |||
|} | |||
No etymology is suggested. | No etymology is suggested. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
preposition “to, for,” because of the vowel quality. If the verbal root were conjugated in the imperfect, the lu- might be the assertive particle “surely” giving the meaning “ | preposition “to, for,” because of the vowel quality. If the verbal root were conjugated in the imperfect, the lu- might be the assertive particle “surely” giving the meaning “ | ||
[He is] surely exalted” (JAT). | [He is] surely exalted” (JAT). | ||
[[Category:Names]] | [[Category:Names]] | ||
Revision as of 21:38, 18 February 2011
| Lehite PN | Soldier, 4th c. AD (Moroni 9:2) |
No etymology is suggested.
Most unlikely is Sumerian lu “man” plus Akkadian rām “exalted,” because ancient Near Eastern onomasticon did not mix languages. The biblical PN Ram (Ruth 4:19; 1 Chronicles 2:9; Job 32:2) does come from “exalted,” as does the last part of Abraham’s former name. But given this possibility, the lu- must be accounted for, and it cannot be the preposition “to, for,” because of the vowel quality. If the verbal root were conjugated in the imperfect, the lu- might be the assertive particle “surely” giving the meaning “ [He is] surely exalted” (JAT).
