LIB: Difference between revisions

From Book of Mormon Onomasticon
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
Urrutia suggests that this may be a variant of [[LEVI|L<small>EVI</small>]] (q.v.), another [[JAREDITES|J<small>AREDITE</small>]] name which he says is perhaps related to Hebrew ''lābīʾ'', “lion,” believing that a number of [[JAREDITES|J<small>AREDITE</small>]] names are related to the lion or leopard (NPSEHA 150.0 [Aug. 1982]). See [[LEVI|L<small>EVI</small>]].
Urrutia suggests that this may be a variant of [[LEVI|L<small>EVI</small>]] (q.v.), another [[JAREDITES|J<small>AREDITE</small>]] name which he says is perhaps related to Hebrew ''lābīʾ'', “lion,” believing that a number of [[JAREDITES|J<small>AREDITE</small>]] names are related to the lion or leopard (NPSEHA 150.0 [Aug. 1982]). See [[LEVI|L<small>EVI</small>]].


Untenable is the suggestion of “whiteness” in Reynolds, Commentary on the Book of Mormon, VI, p. 46. In the Semitic languages “white” and its variations are formed around
Untenable is the suggestion of “whiteness” in [[George Reynolds|Reynolds]], Commentary on the Book of Mormon, VI, p. 46. In the Semitic languages “white” and its variations are formed around


the root ''lbn'', where all three radicals are phonemic; therefore, the n cannot be arbitrarily dropped to obtain “'''LIB'''.”
the root ''lbn'', where all three radicals are phonemic; therefore, the n cannot be arbitrarily dropped to obtain “'''LIB'''.”

Revision as of 11:11, 28 May 2013

Jaredite PN 1. King (Ether 1:17, 18; 10:18, 19 (x3), 29)
2. Usurper (Ether 14:10 (x2), 11 (x2), 12 (x3), 13, 14, 15 (x2), 16 (x3), 17)

Etymology

Although the etymology of JAREDITE names is quite uncertain, one may suggest the common Semitic libb (cf. Heb. lēḇ), "heart; center, midst."

Urrutia suggests that this may be a variant of LEVI (q.v.), another JAREDITE name which he says is perhaps related to Hebrew lābīʾ, “lion,” believing that a number of JAREDITE names are related to the lion or leopard (NPSEHA 150.0 [Aug. 1982]). See LEVI.

Untenable is the suggestion of “whiteness” in Reynolds, Commentary on the Book of Mormon, VI, p. 46. In the Semitic languages “white” and its variations are formed around

the root lbn, where all three radicals are phonemic; therefore, the n cannot be arbitrarily dropped to obtain “LIB.”

Because in many languages the liquid consonants, r and l interchange or are not distinguished, and because p is the unvoiced counterpart of b,[1]

cf. Book of Mormon

RIPLAKISH, RIPLIANCUM, RIPLAH (RFS). Variants

Deseret Alphabet:

Notes


  1. The best example of this is the fact that “paper” and “Bible” can both be traced back to the Late Bronze Age Phoenician city Byblos, where papyrus was first manufactured/merchandized.
RFS