Ezrum/Ezrom Variant: Difference between revisions

From Book of Mormon Onomasticon
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Variant spelling of [[EZROM/EZRUM]]
Variant spelling of [[EZROM/EZRUM|E<small>ZROM</small>]]


- Alma 11:6, 12  
ezrum
:[http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/11.6?lang=eng#5 Alma 11:6]
::P: ezrum
::1830-1981: ezrom
:[http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/11.12?lang=eng#11 Alma 11:12]
::P: ezrum
::1830-1981: ezrom


P: ezrum
Discussion: Spelled ezrum in P; O is not extant for these two occurrences. [[ZEEZROM|Z<small>EEZROM</small>]] is misspelled as Zeezrum six times in [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/11?lang=eng Alma 11], all after [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/11.12?lang=eng#11 Alma 11:12], which suggests that this misspelling was influenced by ezrum. Ezrum likewise was probably set by the 1830 typesetter as ezrom because of the first occurrence of [[ZEEZROM|Z<small>EEZROM</small>]], in [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/10.31?lang=eng#30 Alma 10:31]. Cf. G. Thomasson on metonymy of Zeezrum & ezrum.


A: ezrom 1830 – 1981 RLDS 1908
Summary: Skousen accepts ezrum, the earliest reading.


Discussion: Spelled ezrum in P; O is not extant for these two occurrences. Zeezrom is misspelled as Zeezrum six times in Alma 11, all after Alma 11:12, which suggests that this misspelling was influenced by ezrum. Ezrum likewise was probably set by the 1830 typesetter as ezrom because of the first occurrence of Zeezrom, in Alma 10:31. Cf. G. Thomasson on metonymy of Zeezrum & ezrum
Source: ''ATV'' 3:1806-7; 6:3637.
 
Summary: Skousen accepts ezrum, the earliest reading
 
Source: ATV 3:1806-7, 6:3637


[[Category:Variant Names]]
[[Category:Variant Names]]

Revision as of 14:48, 17 July 2012

Variant spelling of EZROM

ezrum

Alma 11:6
P: ezrum
1830-1981: ezrom
Alma 11:12
P: ezrum
1830-1981: ezrom

Discussion: Spelled ezrum in P; O is not extant for these two occurrences. ZEEZROM is misspelled as Zeezrum six times in Alma 11, all after Alma 11:12, which suggests that this misspelling was influenced by ezrum. Ezrum likewise was probably set by the 1830 typesetter as ezrom because of the first occurrence of ZEEZROM, in Alma 10:31. Cf. G. Thomasson on metonymy of Zeezrum & ezrum.

Summary: Skousen accepts ezrum, the earliest reading.

Source: ATV 3:1806-7; 6:3637.