SIDON: Difference between revisions

From Book of Mormon Onomasticon
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "<pre>‡SIDON Lehite GN River, ca. 87 BC (Alma 2:15; Mormon 1:10) Since this river passed through Zarahemla, and Zarahemla was first settled by Mulekites, it is likely that t...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<pre>‡SIDON
{| class="wikitable"
 
|-
Lehite GN River, ca. 87 BC (Alma 2:15; Mormon 1:10)
|Lehite GN
|River, ca. 87 BC (Alma 2:15; Mormon 1:10)
|}


Since this river passed through Zarahemla, and Zarahemla was first settled by Mulekites, it is likely that this GN is Mulekite. If it does derive from the biblical name for the  
Since this river passed through Zarahemla, and Zarahemla was first settled by Mulekites, it is likely that this GN is Mulekite. If it does derive from the biblical name for the  
Line 11: Line 13:
Unlikely is the comparison with Syriac sidona (v???), “linen garment,” as in Luke 19:20, John 13:4 (RFS).
Unlikely is the comparison with Syriac sidona (v???), “linen garment,” as in Luke 19:20, John 13:4 (RFS).


Cf. Book of Mormon Sidom
Cf. Book of Mormon [[Sidom]]
</pre>
 
[[Category:Names]]

Revision as of 12:50, 9 February 2011

Lehite GN River, ca. 87 BC (Alma 2:15; Mormon 1:10)

Since this river passed through Zarahemla, and Zarahemla was first settled by Mulekites, it is likely that this GN is Mulekite. If it does derive from the biblical name for the Phoenician city Sidon (ṣidon, Phoenician ṣdn, Egyptian ddwn3, Assyrian ṣiduna), as most commentaries suggest, this may denote the presence of Phoenician influence among the Mulekites.

For the etymology see the standard biblical commentaries.

Unlikely is the comparison with Syriac sidona (v???), “linen garment,” as in Luke 19:20, John 13:4 (RFS).

Cf. Book of Mormon Sidom