LURAM: Difference between revisions
From Book of Mormon Onomasticon
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|Soldier, 4th c. AD ([http://scriptures.lds.org/en/moro/9/2#2 Moroni 9:2]) | |Soldier, 4th c. AD ([http://scriptures.lds.org/en/moro/9/2#2 Moroni 9:2]) | ||
|} | |} | ||
'''Etymology''' | |||
No etymology is suggested. | No etymology is suggested. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
See also [[Luram / Laram Variants]] | See also [[Luram / Laram Variants]] | ||
'''Variants''' | |||
[[Luram / Laram Variants|Laram]] | |||
'''Deseret Alphabet:''' | |||
'''Notes''' | |||
---- | |||
[[Category:Names]][[Category:Lehite PN]] | [[Category:Names]][[Category:Lehite PN]] | ||
Revision as of 10:17, 8 June 2012
| Lehite PN | 1. | Soldier, 4th c. AD (Moroni 9:2) |
Etymology
No etymology is suggested.
Most unlikely is Sumerian lu “man” plus Akkadian rām “exalted,” because ancient Near Eastern onomasticon did not mix languages. The biblical PN Ram (Ruth 4:19; 1 Chronicles 2:9; Job 32:2) does come from “exalted,” as does the last part of ABRAHAM’s former name. But given this possibility, the lu- must be accounted for, and it cannot be the preposition “to, for,” because of the vowel quality. If the verbal root were conjugated in the imperfect, the lu- might be the assertive particle “surely” giving the meaning “ [He is] surely exalted” (JAT).
See also Luram / Laram Variants
Variants
Deseret Alphabet:
Notes
