ONIDAH: Difference between revisions

From Book of Mormon Onomasticon
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(32 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
'''Etymology'''
'''Etymology'''


*****
'''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' could mean either “He attends (my) sorrow,” or “He knows (my) affliction,” or a permutation thereof. Also possible, though from a different initial etymon, is “He knows (my) strength.” Given that the hill in question was a gathering place for Zoramites, especially the “poor in heart because of their poverty” ([http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/32.4?lang=eng#3 Alma 32:4]), a GN tied to “sorrow” or “affliction” would seem appropriate.


'''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' could mean either “He attends (my) sorrow,” or “He knows (my) affliction,” or a permutation thereof. Also possible, though from a different initial etymon, is “He knows (my) strength.”
(It needs to be said here that this entry assumes there is a distinction between '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''', which designates a hill in [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/32.4?lang=eng#4 Alma 32:4], and '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' in [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/47.5?lang=eng#5 Alma 47:5], which designates “the place of arms.” Other than that the two GNs are spelled the same in the current editions of the Book of Mormon,  and the relative temporal propinquity of the names, there are no compelling reasons to equate the two sites.  There is however a good reason not to equate the two sites. The original manuscript and the printer’s manuscript of [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/47.5?lang=eng#4 Alma 47:5] have the spelling ''Oneidah,'' while all printed editions of the Book of Mormon, 1830-2013, have the spelling ''Onidah.'' The difference in spelling between ''Onidah'' in [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/32.4?lang=eng#3 Alma 32:4] and the spelling of ''Oneidah'' in the original manuscript and the printer's manuscript of [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/47.5?lang=eng#4 Alma 47:5] (the only place in the Book of Mormon where this “place of arms” is mentioned) strongly suggests that these two GNs are not to be confused. Additionally, it may be significant that [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/32.4?lang=eng#3 Alma 32:4] describes a geographic feature in Zoramite territory, while [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/47.5?lang=eng#4 Alma 47:5] concerns a Lamanite place name. (For '''O<small>NEIDAH</small>''' and also '''O<small>NIHAH</small>''', see their respective pages.)
 
It needs to be said here that this entry assumes there is a distinction between ONIDAH, which designates a hill in Alma 32:4, and ONIDAH in Alma 47:5, which designates “the place of arms.” Other than similarity of spelling and relative temporal propinquity as GNs, there are no compelling reasons to equate the two sites.  There is however a good reason not to equate the two sites. The original manuscript and the printer’s manuscript of Alma 47:5 have the spelling Oneidah, while all printed editions of the Book of Mormon, 1830-2013 have the spelling Onidah. The difference in spelling between Onidah in Alma 32:4 and Oneidah in Alma 47:5 (the only place in the Book of Mormon where this “place of arms” is mentioned) strongly suggests that these two GNs are not to be confused. Additionally, it may be significant that Alma 32:4 describes a geographic feature in Zoramite territory, while Alma 47:5 concerns a Lamanite place name. For ONEIDAH and ONIHAH, see their respective pages.
 
The first element of ONIDAH could be derived from the Hebrew vocable, ʾōn (אֹן), which means “sorrow, mourning, affliction.”  Alternatively, the similar in appearance but different etymon ʾôn (אוֹן), “vigor, strength, wealth,”  deserves consideration. (RFS).
 
The second element of ONIDAH, -(i)dah¬, can be explained as coming from the Hebrew verb yādāʿ. Based on the example of two Old Testament names, the clan name Shemida (from Hebrew šĕmîdāʿ in Numbers 26:32)  and the PN Abida (from ăbîdāʾ in Genesis 25:4), the verbal form yādāʿ could have elided to yield -idāʿ. Concerning šĕmîdāʿ, HALOT accepts as the original form of the name, “שֶמְיָדָע Shem [a theophoric element] has understood” and suggests that “ידע in personal names probably has a different meaning, to be concerned about.” Noth offers “to attend to” as a meaning in PNs.  Thus, two additional permutations of the etymologies suggested above would yield  “(He) is concerned about sorrow,” and “(He) attends to my strength.”
 
If the final element of ONIDAH is analogous to these two names in the King James translation, Shemida and Abida, it would suggest that the medial /i/ in ONIDAH is the remnant of the prefix vowel of yādāʿ. Alternatively, it can be explained as the conflation of the prefix vowel and with the 1.c.s. possessive suffix -ī, modifying ôn/ōn. Thus the parentheses in the suggestions above for this name.
 
Less convincing, is “strength of the assembly,” from Hebrew ʾôn plus the Hebrew word for “assembly, ʿēdâ (עדה). This latter suggestion, because of the vowel configuration, would work better with ONEIDAH than with ONIDAH.
 
As a name for a Zoramite place of gathering to discuss issues, as seems to be the case from the context of the passage, “He knows my affliction,” that is, the affliction of the poorer class of Zoramites, would be a suitable etymology.
 
Plausible is “my strength is knowledge,” from ʾōnī, meaning “my strength” plus the noun form dēʿâ (דֵעָה) meaning “knowledge,” (as in Psalms 73:11). This proposal suffers from the fact that the noun dēʿâ would have to have been contracted to dâ, an unlikely event, but not impossible: The consonant ʿayin in Hebrew is phonemic and would never elide in Hebrew orthography; English orthography, however, does not represent the ʿayin. Additionally, this etymology would seem to fit better as a meaning for ONEIDAH.
 
“Strength is scattered,” as suggested by Jan Wilson,  would come from ʾôn plus niddâḥ, the niphal participle of נדח, meaning “be scattered” or “be seduced.” In a Hebrew vorlage, the /n/ and the /d/ would not be orthographically doubled. Thus, a Hebrew vorlage and an English transcription would have ʾonidaḥ and not ʾônniddâḥ. As a name for a Zoramite place of gathering to discuss issues, “strength is scattered” would seem to be the result of Alma’s preaching to the poorer class of Zoramites, i.e., the strength of the ruling class had been broken among the Zoramites.
 
Because the passage in Alma 32 repeatedly emphasizes that only the “poor” listened to Alma,  the Hebrew etymon ʾānâ “to be suffering,” or “to be poor” naturally comes to mind. The m. s. participial form, ʾōneh, plus dēʿâ, “knowledge,” would yield the meaning, “destitute of knowledge.” While tempting, it would be difficult (but not impossible) to reconcile ONIDAH with ʾōneh, plus dēʿâ.
 
The Hebrew masculine participle ʿōneh means “does reply” in its verbal sense, and in its noun sense “responder” or “answerer.” Add the Hebrew noun dēʿâ, “knowledge,” and the meaning could be “responder of knowledge.” This meaning does not seem to make sense for a geographic location. And, it would be difficult (but not impossible) to reconcile ONIDAH with ʾōneh, plus dēʿâ.
 
Other Semitic possibilities include ʿnd and *ʾnd (the later not attested in any North-west Semitic language) or a compound of two elements. The feminine participle ʿōndâ from the root ʿnd, “to bind,” or “to tie,” does not account for the /i/ of ONIDAH.
 
While the Egyptian GN iwnw, which is rendered ʾōn in Hebrew (On in the King James translation and Heliopolis in Greek) is inviting, it leaves -idah without an interpretation (JH). Likewise the GN ʾônô (e.g., Ezra 2:33). Confer also Egyptian iwnt, “bow, bowman” and iwntyw “tribesmen” (RFS).  There is also wn-t3-, part of a canal name near the first cataract, and wnt as a district name in Budge, Book of the Dead, p. 975 (RFS).
 
Because ONIDAH in Alma 47:5 is glossed as “the place of arms,” it would be tempting to derive the ending -idah as coming from the Hebrew word yād, “hand” or “arm,” in the extended sense “power, arms (=armament).” However, the differences in vowels, which in yād are phonemic, would make it difficult to reconcile yād and -idah.
 
*
'''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' could mean either “He attends (my) sorrow,” or “He knows (my) affliction,” or a permutation thereof. Also possible, though from a different initial etymon, is “He knows (my) strength.” Given that the hill in question was a gathering place for Zoramites, epecially the “poor in heart because of their poverty” (Alma 32:4), a GN tied to “sorrow” or “affliction” would seem appropriate.
 
It needs to be said here that this entry assumes there is a distinction between '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''', which designates a hill in Alma 32:4, and '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' in Alma 47:5, which designates “the place of arms.” Other than similarity of spelling and relative temporal propinquity as GNs, there are no compelling reasons to equate the two sites.  There is however a good reason not to equate the two sites. The original manuscript and the printer’s manuscript of Alma 47:5 have the spelling ''Oneidah,'' while all printed editions of the Book of Mormon, 1830-2013 have the spelling ''Onidah.'' The difference in spelling between ''Onidah'' in Alma 32:4 and ''Oneidah'' ' in Alma 47:5 (the only place in the Book of Mormon where this “place of arms” is mentioned) strongly suggests that these two GNs are not to be confused. Additionally, it may be significant that Alma 32:4 describes a geographic feature in Zoramite territory, while Alma 47:5 concerns a Lamanite place name. For '''O<small>NEIDAH</small>''' and '''O<small>NIHAH</small>''', see their respective pages.  


The first element of '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' could be derived from the Hebrew vocable, ''ʾōn'' (אֹן), which means “sorrow, mourning, affliction.”  Alternatively, the similar in appearance but different etymon ''ʾôn'' (אוֹן), “vigor, strength, wealth,”  deserves consideration. (RFS).
The first element of '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' could be derived from the Hebrew vocable, ''ʾōn'' (אֹן), which means “sorrow, mourning, affliction.”  Alternatively, the similar in appearance but different etymon ''ʾôn'' (אוֹן), “vigor, strength, wealth,”  deserves consideration. (RFS).


The second element of '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''', ''-(i)dah'', can be explained as coming from the Hebrew verb ''yādāʿ''. Based on the example of two Old Testament names, the clan name ''Shemida'' (from Hebrew ''šĕmîdāʿ'' in Numbers 26:32) and the PN ''Abida'' (from ''ăbîdāʾ'' in Genesis 25:4), the verbal form ''yādāʿ'' could have elided to yield ''-idāʿ''. Concerning ''šĕmîdāʿ'', HALOT accepts as the original form of the name, “שֶמְיָדָע Shem [a theophoric element] has understood” and suggests that “ידע in personal names probably has a different meaning, to be concerned about.” Noth offers “to attend to” as a meaning in PNs.  Thus, two additional permutations of the etymologies suggested above would yield “(He) is concerned about sorrow,” and “(He) attends to my strength.”  
The second element of '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''', ''-(i)dah'', can be explained as coming from the Hebrew verb ידע ''yādāʿ''. Based on the example of two Old Testament names, the clan name ''Shemida'' (from Hebrew ''šĕmîdāʿ'' in [https://www.lds.org/scriptures/ot/numbers/26.32?lang=eng#31 Numbers 26:32]) and the PN ''Abida'' (from ''ʾăbîdāʾ'' in [https://www.lds.org/scriptures/ot/genesis/25.4?lang=eng#4 Genesis 25:4]), the /yā/ of the verbal form ידע ''yādāʿ'' elides to yield ''-îdāʿ''. (Concerning ''šĕmîdāʿ'', HALOT accepts as the original form of the name, “שֶמְיָדָע Shem [a theophoric element] has understood” and suggests that “ידע in personal names probably has a different meaning, to be concerned about.” Noth offers “to attend to” as a meaning in PNs. ) Thus, two additional permutations of the etymologies suggested above would yield “(He) is concerned about sorrow,” and “(He) attends to my strength.”  


If the final element of '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' is analogous to these two names in the King James translation, ''Shemida'' and ''Abida'', it would suggest that the medial /i/ in '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' is the remnant of the prefix vowel of ''yādāʿ''. Alternatively, it can be explained as the conflation of the prefix vowel and with the 1.c.s. possessive suffix ''-ī'', modifying ''ôn/ōn''. Thus the parentheses in the suggestions above for this name.
If the final element of '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' is analogous to these two Hebrew names in the King James translation, ''Shemida'' and ''Abida'', it would suggest that the medial /i/ in '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' may also represent the conflation of the 1.c.s. possessive suffix ''-ī'', modifying ''ôn/ōn'', and the remnant of the prefix vowel of ידע ''yādāʿ''. Thus the parentheses in the suggestions above for this name.


Less convincing and less appropriate for a GN would be “strength of the assembly,” from Hebrew ''ʾôn'' plus the Hebrew word for “assembly, ''ʿēdâ'' (עדה). This latter suggestion, because of the vowel configuration and suitable meaning, would work better with '''O<small>NEIDAH</small>''' than with '''O<small>NIDAH</small>'''.  
Less convincing and less appropriate for a GN would be “strength of the assembly,” from Hebrew און ''ʾôn'' plus the Hebrew word for “assembly, ''ʿēdâ'' (עדה). Because of the vowel configuration and lack of a suitable meaning for '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''', this suggestion would work better with '''O<small>NEIDAH</small>''' rather than with '''O<small>NIDAH</small>'''.  


Plausible is “my strength is knowledge,” from ''ʾōnī'', meaning “my strength” plus the noun form ''dēʿâ'' (דֵעָה) meaning “knowledge,” (as in Psalms 73:11). This proposal suffers from the fact that the noun ''dēʿâ'' would have to have been contracted to ''dâ'', an unlikely event, but not impossible: The consonant ''ʿayin'' in Hebrew is phonemic and would never elide in Hebrew orthography; English orthography, however, does not represent the ''ʿayin''. Additionally, this etymology would seem to fit better as a meaning for '''O<small>NIDAH</small>'''.
Plausible is “my strength is knowledge,” from אוני ''ʾōnī'', meaning “my strength” plus the noun form ''dēʿâ'' (דֵעָה) meaning “knowledge,” (as in Psalm 73:11). This proposal suffers from the fact that the noun ''dēʿâ'' would have to have been contracted to ''dâ'', an unlikely event, but not impossible: The consonant ''ʿayin'' in Hebrew is phonemic and would never elide in Hebrew orthography; English orthography on the other hand does not represent the ''ʿayin''. Additionally, this etymology would seem to fit better as a meaning for '''O<small>NEIDAH</small>'''.


“Strength is scattered,” as suggested by Jan Wilson,  would come from ''ʾôn'' plus ''niddâḥ'', the ''niphal'' participle of נדח, meaning “be scattered” or “be seduced.” In a Hebrew vorlage, the /n/ and the /d/ would not be orthographically doubled. Thus, a Hebrew vorlage and an English transcription would have ''ʾonidaḥ'' and not ''ʾônniddâḥ''. As a name for a Zoramite place of gathering to discuss issues, “strength is scattered” would seem to be the result of Alma’s preaching to the poorer class of Zoramites, i.e., the strength of the ruling class had been broken among the Zoramites.
“Strength is scattered,” as suggested by Jan Wilson,  would come from און ''ʾôn'' plus ''niddâḥ'', the ''niphal'' participle of נדח, meaning “be scattered” or “be seduced.” In a Hebrew vorlage, the /n/ and the /d/ would not be orthographically doubled. Thus, a Hebrew vorlage and an English transcription would have ''ʾonidaḥ'' and not ''ʾônniddâḥ''. As a name for a Zoramite place of gathering to discuss issues, “strength is scattered” would seem to be the result of Alma’s preaching to the poorer class of Zoramites, i.e., the strength of the ruling class had been broken among the Zoramites.


Because the passage in Alma 32 repeatedly emphasizes that only the “poor” listened to Alma,  the Hebrew etymon ''ʾānâ'' “to be suffering,” or “to be poor” naturally comes to mind. The m. s. participial form, ''ʾōneh'', plus ''dēʿâ'', “knowledge,” would yield the meaning, “destitute of knowledge.” While tempting, it would be difficult (but not impossible) to reconcile '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' with ''ʾōneh'', plus ''dēʿâ''.
Because the passage in Alma 32 repeatedly emphasizes that only the “poor” listened to Alma,  the Hebrew etymon ''ʾānâ'' “to be suffering,” or “to be poor” naturally comes to mind. The m. s. participial form, ''ʾōneh'', plus ''dēʿâ'', “knowledge,” would yield the meaning, “destitute of knowledge.” While tempting, it would be difficult (but not impossible) to reconcile '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' with ''ʾōneh'', plus ''dēʿâ''.
Line 63: Line 32:
The Hebrew masculine participle ''ʿōneh'' means “does reply” in its verbal sense, and in its noun sense “responder” or “answerer.” Add the Hebrew noun ''dēʿâ'', “knowledge,” and the meaning could be “responder of knowledge.” This meaning does not seem to make sense for a geographic location. And, it would be difficult (but not impossible) to reconcile ONIDAH with ''ʾōneh'', plus ''dēʿâ''.
The Hebrew masculine participle ''ʿōneh'' means “does reply” in its verbal sense, and in its noun sense “responder” or “answerer.” Add the Hebrew noun ''dēʿâ'', “knowledge,” and the meaning could be “responder of knowledge.” This meaning does not seem to make sense for a geographic location. And, it would be difficult (but not impossible) to reconcile ONIDAH with ''ʾōneh'', plus ''dēʿâ''.


Other Semitic possibilities include ''ʿnd'' and *''ʾnd'' (the later not attested in any North-west Semitic language) or a compound of two elements. The feminine participle ''ʿōndâ'' from the root ʿnd, “to bind,” or “to tie,” does not account for the /i/ of '''O<small>NIDAH</small>'''.  
Hypothetically, other possible Semitic roots include ''ʿnd'' and *''ʾnd'' (the later not attested in any North-west Semitic language) or a compound composed of either etymon. However, both vocables pose significant issues. For instance, the feminine participle ''ʿōndâ'' from the root ʿnd, “to bind,” or “to tie,” does not account for the /i/ of '''O<small>NIDAH</small>'''.  


While the Egyptian GN ''iwnw'', which is rendered ''ʾōn'' in Hebrew (''On'' in the King James translation and ''Heliopolis'' in Greek) is inviting, it leaves ''-idah'' without an interpretation (JH). Likewise the GN ''ʾônô'' (e.g., Ezra 2:33). Confer also Egyptian ''iwnt'', “bow, bowman” and ''iwntyw'', “tribesmen” (RFS).  There is also ''wn-t3-'', part of a canal name near the first cataract, and ''wnt'' as a district name in Budge, ''Book of the Dead'', p. 975 (RFS).  
While the Egyptian GN ''iwnw'', which is rendered ''ʾōn'' in Hebrew (''On'' in the King James translation and ''Heliopolis'' in Greek) is inviting, it leaves ''-idah'' without an interpretation (JH). Likewise the GN ''ʾônô'' (e.g., Ezra 2:33). Confer also Egyptian ''iwnt'', “bow, bowman” and ''iwntyw'', “tribesmen” (RFS).  There is also ''wn-t3-'', part of a canal name near the first cataract, and ''wnt'' as a district name in Budge, ''Book of the Dead'', p. 975 (RFS).  
Line 72: Line 41:




*****
If the derivation of the name of the hill in [[ZORAMITE(S)|Z<small>ORAMITE</small>]] territory ([http://scriptures.lds.org/en/alma/32/4#4 Alma 32:4]) is identical to that of the [[LAMANITE(S)|L<small>AMANITE</small>]] place ([http://scriptures.lds.org/en/alma/47/5#5 Alma 47:5]), then ideally, the etymology of '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' would
explain why the received text contains the gloss, “the place of arms,” in [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/alma/47/5#5 Alma 47:5]. However, the possibility that the two [[Geographical Name|GN]]s are etymologically unrelated cannot be ruled
out. Nevertheless, the following comments assume no distinction.
The Semitic possibilities include ''ʿnd'' and ''*ʾnd'' or a compound of two elements. ''ʿnd'', “to bind,” would mean in the feminine participle “binder,” though this seems an unlikely
name for a hill.
Several elements may be considered when looking for a compound. Biblical ''ʾōn'', “strength,” appears with the 1.c.s. possessive suffix, ''ʾōnī'', “my strength,” in [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/gen/49/3#3 Genesis 49:3]
and as a [[Personal Name|PN]] in [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/num/16/1#1 Numbers 16:1]. It is also possible that the biblical [[Geographical Name|GN]] Ono, ''ʾōnō'' ([http://scriptures.lds.org/en/1_chr/8/12#12 1 Chronicles 8:12]; [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/neh/6/2#2 Nehemiah 6:2]; [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/neh/11/35#35 11:35]), probably identical to the Amarna and [[ASSYRIAN|A<small>SSYRIAN</small>]] [[Geographical Name|GN]]
for a city in Palestine, ''ʾu-nu'' (see [[William F. Albright|Albright]], [[William F. Albright, The Vocalization of the Egyptian Syllabic Orthography. AOS 5. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1934/ reprint Millwood, N.Y., 1974.|''VESO'']], p. 35), derives from this root and would mean “his strength” ([[Robert F. Smith|RFS]]). From the [[HEBREW|H<small>EBREW</small>]] root ''ydʿ'', “to know,” the imperative
3m.s. is ''daʿ'' and a noun form  ''dē'' ''ʿāh'' in [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/ps/73/11#11 Psalms 73:11] means “knowledge.” Though the syntax would be wrong for [[HEBREW|H<small>EBREW</small>]], '''O<small>NIDAH</small>''' therefore could mean “know my strength.”
Less likely is “assembly of strength” from ''ʾōn'' and [[HEBREW|H<small>EBREW</small>]] ''ʿēdāh'', “assembly.” Both of these possibilities seem unusual for a [[Geographical Name|GN]]. Equally questionable is a derivation from
[[HEBREW|H<small>EBREW</small>]] ''ʿv̄n'', “to dwell,” because the noun is unattested ([[Jo Ann Hackett|JH]]). Much less likely is a derivation from [[HEBREW|H<small>EBREW</small>]] ''yad'', “hand, arm” and in the extended sense “power, arms
(=armament),” because the differences in vowels, which in ''yad'' are phonemic, would make it difficult to reconcile ''yad'' and ''-idah'', as tempting as the translation “depository
of arms” might be.
The [[EGYPT|E<small>GYPTIAN</small>]] [[Geographical Name|GN]] ''iwnw'' (Greek Heliopolis) becomes in [[HEBREW|H<small>EBREW</small>]] ''ʾon'' (“On” in the [[King James Version|KJV]]). While this is inviting, it leaves ''-idah'' without an interpretation ([[Jo Ann Hackett|JH]]). Confer also [[EGYPT|E<small>GYPTIAN</small>]]
''iwnt'', “bow, bowman” and ''iwntyw'' “tribesmen” ([[Robert F. Smith|RFS]]). There is also ''wnt3'', part of a canal name near the first cataract and ''wnt'' as a district name in the Budge, Book of the
Dead, p. 975 ([[Robert F. Smith|RFS]]).
Cf. Onitah in the Book of Abraham and its variant form Onitos in the Alphabet & Grammar ([[Robert F. Smith|RFS]]).
Cf. Book of Mormon [[ONIHAH|O<small>NIHAH</small>]]
See also [[Onidah / Oneidah Variants]]


'''Variants'''
'''Variants'''

Latest revision as of 12:40, 9 October 2023

Lehite GN 1. Hill, ca. 75 BC (Alma 32:4)
2. For the name in Alma 47:5, Onidah, see Oneidah.

Etymology

ONIDAH could mean either “He attends (my) sorrow,” or “He knows (my) affliction,” or a permutation thereof. Also possible, though from a different initial etymon, is “He knows (my) strength.” Given that the hill in question was a gathering place for Zoramites, especially the “poor in heart because of their poverty” (Alma 32:4), a GN tied to “sorrow” or “affliction” would seem appropriate.

(It needs to be said here that this entry assumes there is a distinction between ONIDAH, which designates a hill in Alma 32:4, and ONIDAH in Alma 47:5, which designates “the place of arms.” Other than that the two GNs are spelled the same in the current editions of the Book of Mormon, and the relative temporal propinquity of the names, there are no compelling reasons to equate the two sites. There is however a good reason not to equate the two sites. The original manuscript and the printer’s manuscript of Alma 47:5 have the spelling Oneidah, while all printed editions of the Book of Mormon, 1830-2013, have the spelling Onidah. The difference in spelling between Onidah in Alma 32:4 and the spelling of Oneidah in the original manuscript and the printer's manuscript of Alma 47:5 (the only place in the Book of Mormon where this “place of arms” is mentioned) strongly suggests that these two GNs are not to be confused. Additionally, it may be significant that Alma 32:4 describes a geographic feature in Zoramite territory, while Alma 47:5 concerns a Lamanite place name. (For ONEIDAH and also ONIHAH, see their respective pages.)

The first element of ONIDAH could be derived from the Hebrew vocable, ʾōn (אֹן), which means “sorrow, mourning, affliction.” Alternatively, the similar in appearance but different etymon ʾôn (אוֹן), “vigor, strength, wealth,” deserves consideration. (RFS).

The second element of ONIDAH, -(i)dah, can be explained as coming from the Hebrew verb ידע yādāʿ. Based on the example of two Old Testament names, the clan name Shemida (from Hebrew šĕmîdāʿ in Numbers 26:32) and the PN Abida (from ʾăbîdāʾ in Genesis 25:4), the /yā/ of the verbal form ידע yādāʿ elides to yield -îdāʿ. (Concerning šĕmîdāʿ, HALOT accepts as the original form of the name, “שֶמְיָדָע Shem [a theophoric element] has understood” and suggests that “ידע in personal names probably has a different meaning, to be concerned about.” Noth offers “to attend to” as a meaning in PNs. ) Thus, two additional permutations of the etymologies suggested above would yield “(He) is concerned about sorrow,” and “(He) attends to my strength.”

If the final element of ONIDAH is analogous to these two Hebrew names in the King James translation, Shemida and Abida, it would suggest that the medial /i/ in ONIDAH may also represent the conflation of the 1.c.s. possessive suffix , modifying ôn/ōn, and the remnant of the prefix vowel of ידע yādāʿ. Thus the parentheses in the suggestions above for this name.

Less convincing and less appropriate for a GN would be “strength of the assembly,” from Hebrew און ʾôn plus the Hebrew word for “assembly, ʿēdâ (עדה). Because of the vowel configuration and lack of a suitable meaning for ONIDAH, this suggestion would work better with ONEIDAH rather than with ONIDAH.

Plausible is “my strength is knowledge,” from אוני ʾōnī, meaning “my strength” plus the noun form dēʿâ (דֵעָה) meaning “knowledge,” (as in Psalm 73:11). This proposal suffers from the fact that the noun dēʿâ would have to have been contracted to , an unlikely event, but not impossible: The consonant ʿayin in Hebrew is phonemic and would never elide in Hebrew orthography; English orthography on the other hand does not represent the ʿayin. Additionally, this etymology would seem to fit better as a meaning for ONEIDAH.

“Strength is scattered,” as suggested by Jan Wilson, would come from און ʾôn plus niddâḥ, the niphal participle of נדח, meaning “be scattered” or “be seduced.” In a Hebrew vorlage, the /n/ and the /d/ would not be orthographically doubled. Thus, a Hebrew vorlage and an English transcription would have ʾonidaḥ and not ʾônniddâḥ. As a name for a Zoramite place of gathering to discuss issues, “strength is scattered” would seem to be the result of Alma’s preaching to the poorer class of Zoramites, i.e., the strength of the ruling class had been broken among the Zoramites.

Because the passage in Alma 32 repeatedly emphasizes that only the “poor” listened to Alma, the Hebrew etymon ʾānâ “to be suffering,” or “to be poor” naturally comes to mind. The m. s. participial form, ʾōneh, plus dēʿâ, “knowledge,” would yield the meaning, “destitute of knowledge.” While tempting, it would be difficult (but not impossible) to reconcile ONIDAH with ʾōneh, plus dēʿâ.

The Hebrew masculine participle ʿōneh means “does reply” in its verbal sense, and in its noun sense “responder” or “answerer.” Add the Hebrew noun dēʿâ, “knowledge,” and the meaning could be “responder of knowledge.” This meaning does not seem to make sense for a geographic location. And, it would be difficult (but not impossible) to reconcile ONIDAH with ʾōneh, plus dēʿâ.

Hypothetically, other possible Semitic roots include ʿnd and *ʾnd (the later not attested in any North-west Semitic language) or a compound composed of either etymon. However, both vocables pose significant issues. For instance, the feminine participle ʿōndâ from the root ʿnd, “to bind,” or “to tie,” does not account for the /i/ of ONIDAH.

While the Egyptian GN iwnw, which is rendered ʾōn in Hebrew (On in the King James translation and Heliopolis in Greek) is inviting, it leaves -idah without an interpretation (JH). Likewise the GN ʾônô (e.g., Ezra 2:33). Confer also Egyptian iwnt, “bow, bowman” and iwntyw, “tribesmen” (RFS). There is also wn-t3-, part of a canal name near the first cataract, and wnt as a district name in Budge, Book of the Dead, p. 975 (RFS).

Cf. Book of Mormon ONIDAH and ONEIDAH

See also Onitah in the Book of Abraham and its variant form On-i-tos in the Alphabet & Grammar (RFS).


Variants

Oneidah

Deseret Alphabet: 𐐄𐐤𐐌𐐔𐐂 (oʊnaɪdɑː)

Notes


<< Onidah >>

Name Index

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z