LEAH: Difference between revisions

From Book of Mormon Onomasticon
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
'''Etymology'''
'''Etymology'''


The term '''LEAH''' refers to the smallest unit of [[NEPHITE(S)|N<small>EPHITE</small>]] monetary measure. The word may derive from the Hebrew root *''lʾh'' "to be weak, weary," though its opposite meaning, "to be strong, capable," is also given.<ref>''HALOT'', 2:512-13; the eminent German Semitist Theodor Nöldeke has written an extensive study on roots having opposite meanings in the Semitic languages, "Wurzeln mit Gegensinn (addad)," in ''Neue Beiträge zur semitischen Sprachwissenschaft'' (Strassburg: Karl Trübner, 1910/reprint: Amsterdam: APA-Philo Press, 1982), 67-108.</ref>
The term '''LEAH''' refers to the smallest unit of [[NEPHITE(S)|N<small>EPHITE</small>]] monetary measure. The word may derive from the [[HEBREW|H<small>EBREW</small>]] root *''lʾh'' "to be weak, weary," though its opposite meaning, "to be strong, capable," is also given.<ref>''HALOT'', 2:512-13; the eminent German Semitist Theodor Nöldeke has written an extensive study on roots having opposite meanings in the Semitic languages, "Wurzeln mit Gegensinn (addad)," in ''Neue Beiträge zur semitischen Sprachwissenschaft'' (Strassburg: Karl Trübner, 1910/reprint: Amsterdam: APA-Philo Press, 1982), 67-108.</ref>


'''Variants'''
'''Variants'''

Revision as of 10:45, 24 October 2013

Lehite noun 1. Unit of NEPHITE currency (Alma 11:17)

Etymology

The term LEAH refers to the smallest unit of NEPHITE monetary measure. The word may derive from the HEBREW root *lʾh "to be weak, weary," though its opposite meaning, "to be strong, capable," is also given.[1]

Variants

Deseret Alphabet: 𐐢𐐀𐐂 (liːɑː)

Notes


  1. HALOT, 2:512-13; the eminent German Semitist Theodor Nöldeke has written an extensive study on roots having opposite meanings in the Semitic languages, "Wurzeln mit Gegensinn (addad)," in Neue Beiträge zur semitischen Sprachwissenschaft (Strassburg: Karl Trübner, 1910/reprint: Amsterdam: APA-Philo Press, 1982), 67-108.