AMULEK: Difference between revisions
From Book of Mormon Onomasticon
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|'''[[:Category:Nephite PN|Nephite PN]]''' | |'''[[:Category:Nephite PN|Nephite PN]]''' | ||
|1. | |1. | ||
|Prophet/missionary from [[AMMONIHAH|A<small>MMONIHAH</small>]], 1st c. | |Prophet/missionary from [[AMMONIHAH|A<small>MMONIHAH</small>]], 1st c. BC ([http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/8.21,%2022,%2023,%2026,%2027,%2029,%2030?lang=eng#20 Alma 8:21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 29, 30]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/9.1,%2034?lang=eng#primary 9: Preface, 1, 34 (x2)]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/10.1,%202,%207,%2012,%2016,%2017,%2024,%2025,%2028,%2031?lang=eng#primary 10:1, 2, 7, 12, 16, 17, 24, 25, 28, 31]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/11.20,%2021,%2022,%2023,%2027,%2034,%2036,%2039,%2046?lang=eng#19 11:20, 21 (x2), 22, 23, 27, 34, 36, 39, 46 (x2)]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/12.1,%207,%208,%2012,%2024?lang=eng#primary 12:1 (x4), 7, 8, 12, 24]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/14.2,%203,%205,%207,%209,%2010,%2012,%2014,%2017,%2023,%2025,%2027,%2028,%2029?lang=eng#1 14:2 (x2), 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 17, 23, 25, 27, 28 (x2), 29 (x3)]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/15.1,%203,%204,%2015,%2016?lang=eng#primary 15:1, 3, 4, 15, 16 (x2)]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/16.13,%2015?lang=eng#12 16:13, 15]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/31.6,%2032?lang=eng#5 31:6, 32]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/34.1?lang=eng#primary 34:1]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/35.1?lang=eng#primary 35:1]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/hel/5.10,%2041?lang=eng#9 Helaman 5:10, 41]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/ether/12.13?lang=eng#12 Ether 12:13]) | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 17:14, 10 July 2012
This entry is not finished
Etymology
Probably a variant form from MULEK, on which see the same below. The initial vowel could be the vestiges of the definite article (see the discussion under “a-” in “Studies”), and would translate approximately “the Mulek.” A prosthetic aleph is not likely because there is no consonant cluster to dissolve.
See also Amulek Variant
Variants
Deseret Alphabet:
Notes
