SIDON: Difference between revisions
From Book of Mormon Onomasticon
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|River, ca. 87 BC ([http://scriptures.lds.org/en/alma/2/15#15 Alma 2:15]; [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/morm/1/10#10 Mormon 1:10]) | |River, ca. 87 BC ([http://scriptures.lds.org/en/alma/2/15#15 Alma 2:15]; [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/morm/1/10#10 Mormon 1:10]) | ||
|} | |} | ||
'''This entry is not finished''' | |||
'''Etymology''' | '''Etymology''' |
Revision as of 09:01, 27 June 2012
Lehite GN | 1. | River, ca. 87 BC (Alma 2:15; Mormon 1:10) |
This entry is not finished
Etymology
Since this river passed through ZERAHEMLA, and ZERAHEMLA was first settled by Mulekites, it is likely that this GN is Mulekite. If it does derive from the biblical name for the Phoenician city SIDON (ṣidon, Phoenician ṣdn, EGYPTIAN ddwn3, ASSYRIAN ṣiduna), as most commentaries suggest, this may denote the presence of Phoenician influence among the Mulekites.
For the etymology see the standard biblical commentaries.
Unlikely is the comparison with Syriac sidona (v???), “linen garment,” as in Luke 19:20, John 13:4 (RFS).
Cf. Book of Mormon SIDOM
See also Sidon Variants
Variants
Deseret Alphabet:
Notes