AMALICKIAH: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
As with [[AMALEKI|A<small>MALEKI</small>]] and its gentilic, the temptation is to see the common Semitic root ''mlk'' or the biblical PN and gentilic ''ʿmlq'', Amalek. It is possible that the ending, -''iah'', is the theophoric Hebrew shortened form of the divine name ''yhwh'', Jehovah. If so, this would be the only instance in the Book of Mormon onomasticon. In the only other possible example, [[MOSIAH|M<small>OSIAH</small>]], the theophoric nature of -''iah'' is questionable. (All other names in the Book of Mormon with the -''iah'' ending are biblical.) | As with [[AMALEKI|A<small>MALEKI</small>]] and its gentilic, the temptation is to see the common Semitic root ''mlk'' or the biblical PN and gentilic ''ʿmlq'', Amalek. It is possible that the ending, -''iah'', is the theophoric Hebrew shortened form of the divine name ''yhwh'', Jehovah. If so, this would be the only instance in the Book of Mormon onomasticon. In the only other possible example, [[MOSIAH|M<small>OSIAH</small>]], the theophoric nature of -''iah'' is questionable. (All other names in the Book of Mormon with the -''iah'' ending are biblical.) | ||
The etymology based on biblical Amalek has strengths and weaknesses. It would account for the initial vowel (though the etymology is still unclear). But unless this was a name given to him by his enemies, it would be difficult to explain how a [[NEPHITE(S)|N<small>EPHITE</small>]] could have a name based on an Old Testament people despised by the Hebrews. If it were given to him by the righteous [[NEPHITE(S)|N<small>EPHITES</small>]], it would be difficult to explain why they would add the theophoric element ([[Jo Ann Hackett|JH]]). Note however the biblical PN of a priest in the days of King [[DAVID|D<small>AVID</small>]], ''ʿbd-ʾdm'' Obed-Edom, which could be interpreted as “servant of | The etymology based on biblical Amalek has strengths and weaknesses. It would account for the initial vowel (though the etymology is still unclear). But unless this was a name given to him by his enemies, it would be difficult to explain how a [[NEPHITE(S)|N<small>EPHITE</small>]] could have a name based on an Old Testament people despised by the Hebrews. If it were given to him by the righteous [[NEPHITE(S)|N<small>EPHITES</small>]], it would be difficult to explain why they would add the theophoric element ([[Jo Ann Hackett|JH]]). Note however the biblical PN of a priest in the days of King [[DAVID|D<small>AVID</small>]], ''ʿbd-ʾdm'' Obed-Edom, which could be interpreted as “servant of [[EDOM|E<small>DOM</small>]],” the people who in later biblical periods, particularly in Hezekiah’s day, were despised by the Jews. | ||
A remote possibility, though hardly plausible, is a feminine form, ''ʿmlqyh'', Amalekiah, “Amalekitess,” which would explain all the vowels and consonants ([[Jo Ann Hackett|JH]]). | A remote possibility, though hardly plausible, is a feminine form, ''ʿmlqyh'', Amalekiah, “Amalekitess,” which would explain all the vowels and consonants ([[Jo Ann Hackett|JH]]). | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
If the ending is the theophoric name and the first element were somehow from the root ''mlk'', then it would have the ironic meaning “Yahweh is king” or “Yahweh rules,” borne by a man who contrived to make not God, but himself, king ([[John W. Welch|JWW]]). | If the ending is the theophoric name and the first element were somehow from the root ''mlk'', then it would have the ironic meaning “Yahweh is king” or “Yahweh rules,” borne by a man who contrived to make not God, but himself, king ([[John W. Welch|JWW]]). | ||
See Book of Mormon [[AMALEKI]], [[AMLICI]], [[AMULEK]], [[MULEK]], [[MELEK]], et al. | See Book of Mormon [[AMALEKI|A<small>MALEKI</small>]], [[AMLICI|A<small>MLICI</small>]], [[AMULEK|A<small>MULEK</small>]], [[MULEK|M<small>ULEK</small>]], [[MELEK|M<small>ELEK</small>]], et al. | ||
See also [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant]] | See also [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant]] | ||
[[Category:Names]][[Category:Lehite PN]] | [[Category:Names]][[Category:Lehite PN]] | ||
Revision as of 11:14, 14 February 2012
| Lehite PN | 1. | Rebel who became king of the LAMANITES, ca. 73–67 BC (Alma 46:3; 62:35) |
As with AMALEKI and its gentilic, the temptation is to see the common Semitic root mlk or the biblical PN and gentilic ʿmlq, Amalek. It is possible that the ending, -iah, is the theophoric Hebrew shortened form of the divine name yhwh, Jehovah. If so, this would be the only instance in the Book of Mormon onomasticon. In the only other possible example, MOSIAH, the theophoric nature of -iah is questionable. (All other names in the Book of Mormon with the -iah ending are biblical.)
The etymology based on biblical Amalek has strengths and weaknesses. It would account for the initial vowel (though the etymology is still unclear). But unless this was a name given to him by his enemies, it would be difficult to explain how a NEPHITE could have a name based on an Old Testament people despised by the Hebrews. If it were given to him by the righteous NEPHITES, it would be difficult to explain why they would add the theophoric element (JH). Note however the biblical PN of a priest in the days of King DAVID, ʿbd-ʾdm Obed-Edom, which could be interpreted as “servant of EDOM,” the people who in later biblical periods, particularly in Hezekiah’s day, were despised by the Jews.
A remote possibility, though hardly plausible, is a feminine form, ʿmlqyh, Amalekiah, “Amalekitess,” which would explain all the vowels and consonants (JH).
It is possible that AMALICKIAH is related to AMALEKI, though the Book of Mormon consistently writes the latter with a “k” and the former with “ck.”
Notes
If the ending is the theophoric name and the first element were somehow from the root mlk, then it would have the ironic meaning “Yahweh is king” or “Yahweh rules,” borne by a man who contrived to make not God, but himself, king (JWW).
See Book of Mormon AMALEKI, AMLICI, AMULEK, MULEK, MELEK, et al.
See also Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant
