AMALICKIAH: Difference between revisions

From Book of Mormon Onomasticon
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
|Rebel who became king of the [[LAMANITE(S)|L<small>AMANITES</small>]], ca. 73–67 BC ([http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/46.3,%204,%205,%206,%207,%2010,%2011,%2028,%2029,%2030,%2031,%2032,%2033?lang=eng#2 Alma 46:3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 28, 29, 30 (x3), 31, 32, 33]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/47.1,%203,%204,%2011,%2012,%2013,%2014,%2015,%2016,%2018,%2019,%2020,%2021,%2022,%2025,%2027,%2030,%2032,%2033,%2034,%2035?lang=eng#primary 47:1, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 (x3), 14, 15 (x2), 16, 18, 19, 20, 21 (x2), 22, 25, 27 (x2), 30, 32, 33, 34, 35]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/48.1,%207?lang=eng#primary 48:1, 7]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/49.10,%2011,%2025?lang=eng#9 49:10, 11, 25]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/51.9,%2011,%2012,%2023,%2025,%2027,%2030,%2032,%2033,%2037?lang=eng#8 51:9, 11, 12, 23 (x2), 25, 27, 30, 32, 33, 37]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/52.1,%203?lang=eng#primary 52:1, 3 (x2)]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/54.16?lang=eng#15 54:16]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/55.5?lang=eng#4 55:5]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/62.35?lang=eng#34 62:35])
|Rebel who became king of the [[LAMANITE(S)|L<small>AMANITES</small>]], ca. 73–67 BC ([http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/46.3,%204,%205,%206,%207,%2010,%2011,%2028,%2029,%2030,%2031,%2032,%2033?lang=eng#2 Alma 46:3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 28, 29, 30 (x3), 31, 32, 33]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/47.1,%203,%204,%2011,%2012,%2013,%2014,%2015,%2016,%2018,%2019,%2020,%2021,%2022,%2025,%2027,%2030,%2032,%2033,%2034,%2035?lang=eng#primary 47:1, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 (x3), 14, 15 (x2), 16, 18, 19, 20, 21 (x2), 22, 25, 27 (x2), 30, 32, 33, 34, 35]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/48.1,%207?lang=eng#primary 48:1, 7]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/49.10,%2011,%2025?lang=eng#9 49:10, 11, 25]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/51.9,%2011,%2012,%2023,%2025,%2027,%2030,%2032,%2033,%2037?lang=eng#8 51:9, 11, 12, 23 (x2), 25, 27, 30, 32, 33, 37]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/52.1,%203?lang=eng#primary 52:1, 3 (x2)]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/54.16?lang=eng#15 54:16]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/55.5?lang=eng#4 55:5]; [http://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/alma/62.35?lang=eng#34 62:35])
|}
|}
'''This entry is not finished'''
'''Etymology'''
'''Etymology'''


As with [[AMALEKI|A<small>MALEKI</small>]] and its gentilic, the temptation is to see the common Semitic root ''mlk'' or the biblical PN and gentilic ''ʿmlq'', Amalek. It is possible that the ending, -''iah'', is the theophoric Hebrew shortened form of the divine name ''yhwh'', Jehovah. If so, this would be the only instance in the Book of Mormon onomasticon. In the only other possible example, [[MOSIAH|M<small>OSIAH</small>]], the theophoric nature of -''iah'' is questionable. (All other names in the Book of Mormon with the -''iah'' ending are biblical.)
As with [[AMALEKI|A<small>MALEKI</small>]] and its gentilic, the temptation is to see the common Semitic root ''mlk'' or the biblical [[Personal Name|PN]] and gentilic עמלק ''ʿmlq'', Amalek. It is possible that the ending, -''iah'', is the theophoric [[HEBREW|H<small>EBREW</small>]] shortened form of the [[Divine Name|DN]] ''yhwh'', Jehovah. If so, this would be the only instance in the Book of Mormon onomasticon. In the only other possible example, [[MOSIAH|M<small>OSIAH</small>]], the theophoric nature of -''iah'' is questionable. (All other names in the Book of Mormon with the -''iah'' ending are biblical.)


The etymology based on biblical Amalek has strengths and weaknesses. It would account for the initial vowel (though the etymology is still unclear). But unless this was a name given to him by his enemies, it would be difficult to explain how a [[NEPHITE(S)|N<small>EPHITE</small>]] could have a name based on an Old Testament people despised by the Hebrews. If it were given to him by the righteous [[NEPHITE(S)|N<small>EPHITES</small>]], it would be difficult to explain why they would add the theophoric element ([[Jo Ann Hackett|JH]]). Note however the biblical PN of a priest in the days of King [[DAVID|D<small>AVID</small>]], ''ʿbd-ʾdm'' Obed-Edom, which could be interpreted as “servant of [[EDOM|E<small>DOM</small>]],” the people who in later biblical periods, particularly in Hezekiah’s day, were despised by the Jews.  
The etymology based on biblical Amalek has strengths and weaknesses. It would account for the initial vowel (though the etymology is still unclear). But unless this was a name given to him by his enemies, it would be difficult to explain how a [[NEPHITE(S)|N<small>EPHITE</small>]] could have a name based on an Old Testament people despised by the [[HEBREW|H<small>EBREWS</small>]]. If it were given to him by the righteous [[NEPHITE(S)|N<small>EPHITES</small>]], it would be difficult to explain why they would add the theophoric element ([[Jo Ann Hackett|JH]]). Note however the biblical [[Personal Name|PN]] of a priest in the days of King [[DAVID|D<small>AVID</small>]], ''ʿbd-ʾdm'' Obed-Edom, which could be interpreted as “servant of [[EDOM|E<small>DOM</small>]],” the people who in later biblical periods, particularly in Hezekiah’s day, were despised by the Jews.  


A remote possibility, though hardly plausible, is a feminine form, ''ʿmlqyh'', Amalekiah, “Amalekitess,” which would explain all the vowels and consonants ([[Jo Ann Hackett|JH]]).  
A remote possibility, though hardly plausible, is a feminine form, ''ʿmlqyh'', Amalekiah, “Amalekitess,” which would explain all the vowels and consonants ([[Jo Ann Hackett|JH]]).  


It is possible that '''AMALICKIAH''' is related to [[AMALEKI|A<small>MALEKI</small>]], though the Book of Mormon consistently writes the latter with a “''k''” and the former with “''ck''.”  
It is possible that '''A<small>MALICKIAH</small>''' is related to [[AMALEKI|A<small>MALEKI</small>]], though the Book of Mormon consistently writes the latter with a “''k''” and the former with “''ck''.”<ref>For all the variant spellings of these names see [[Royal J. Skousen|Skousen]], Royal. ''Analysis of Textual Variants of the Book of Mormon'' 6 Parts. Provo, UT: [[Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies|FARMS]], 2005. For [[AMALEKI|A<small>MALEKI</small>]] see p. 1116 and for '''A<small>MALICKIAH</small>''' p. 2529. Also see [[Robert F. Smith|Smith, Robert F.]] ''Critical Text'' Second Edition. Provo, UT: [[Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies|FARMS]] 1986-7, Appendix III, “Book of Mormon Onomasticon Variants, 1225”).</ref>


If the ending is the theophoric name and the first element were somehow from the root ''mlk'', then it would have the ironic meaning “Yahweh is king” or “Yahweh rules,” borne by a man who contrived to make not God, but himself, king ([[John W. Welch|JWW]]).  
If the ending is the theophoric name and the first element were somehow from the root מלך ''mlk'', then it would have the ironic meaning “Yahweh is king” or “Yahweh rules,” borne by a man who contrived to make not God, but himself, king ([[John W. Welch|JWW]]).  


See Book of Mormon [[AMALEKI|A<small>MALEKI</small>]], [[AMLICI|A<small>MLICI</small>]], [[AMULEK|A<small>MULEK</small>]], [[MULEK|M<small>ULEK</small>]], [[MELEK|M<small>ELEK</small>]], et al.
See Book of Mormon [[AMALEKI|A<small>MALEKI</small>]], [[AMLICI|A<small>MLICI</small>]], [[AMULEK|A<small>MULEK</small>]], [[MULEK|M<small>ULEK</small>]], [[MELEK|M<small>ELEK</small>]], et al.
Line 26: Line 23:
'''Variants'''
'''Variants'''


[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleckiah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ame( )eckiah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amelickiah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|( )male( )]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amele( )]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleck( )]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleckiah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amaleckiah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ame( )ckiah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amelickaah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Anelickiahs]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amelickiah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleckiak]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amelleckiah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleckeah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleckiah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amaleckeah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleck( )]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amelec( )]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleckia( )]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleckiah]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleckiah]]
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amaleki]], [[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleckiah]],
 
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amaleckeah]],  
'''Deseret Alphabet:'''
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amelickiah]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amelickidh]],
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amalickaah]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amaleckiah]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Aaalickiah]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amelickaah]],
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amalkiah]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleckiak]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amalickeah]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amellckiah]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ameleckeah]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amalichiah]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amelechiah]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amelichiah]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Ammuckiah]],  
[[Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant|Amalekiah]]
'''[[Deseret Alphabet]]:''' 𐐈𐐣𐐈𐐢𐐆𐐗𐐌𐐂 (æmælɪkaɪɑː), 𐐈𐐣𐐈𐐢𐐆𐐄𐐌𐐂 (æmælɪoʊaɪɑː)


'''Notes'''
'''Notes'''
----
----
<references/>
[[Category:Names]][[Category:Lehite PN]]
[[Category:Names]][[Category:Lehite PN]]
<div style="text-align: center;"> [[AMALEKITES|<<]] Amalickiah [[AMALICKIAHITES|>>]] </div>
==[[Name Index]]==
<big>
{|border="0" cellpadding="1" width="100%pt"
|-
|[[A]]
|[[B]]
|[[C]]
|[[D]]
|[[E]]
|<font color="lightgray">F</font>
|[[G]]
|[[H]]
|[[I]]
|[[J]]
|[[K]]
|[[L]]
|[[M]]
|[[N]]
|[[O]]
|[[P]]
|<font color="lightgray">Q</font>
|[[R]]
|[[S]]
|[[T]]
|[[U]]
|<font color="lightgray">V</font>
|<font color="lightgray">W</font>
|<font color="lightgray">X</font>
|<font color="lightgray">Y</font>
|[[Z]]
|}

Latest revision as of 17:52, 22 June 2023

Lehite PN 1. Rebel who became king of the LAMANITES, ca. 73–67 BC (Alma 46:3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 28, 29, 30 (x3), 31, 32, 33; 47:1, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 (x3), 14, 15 (x2), 16, 18, 19, 20, 21 (x2), 22, 25, 27 (x2), 30, 32, 33, 34, 35; 48:1, 7; 49:10, 11, 25; 51:9, 11, 12, 23 (x2), 25, 27, 30, 32, 33, 37; 52:1, 3 (x2); 54:16; 55:5; 62:35)

Etymology

As with AMALEKI and its gentilic, the temptation is to see the common Semitic root mlk or the biblical PN and gentilic עמלק ʿmlq, Amalek. It is possible that the ending, -iah, is the theophoric HEBREW shortened form of the DN yhwh, Jehovah. If so, this would be the only instance in the Book of Mormon onomasticon. In the only other possible example, MOSIAH, the theophoric nature of -iah is questionable. (All other names in the Book of Mormon with the -iah ending are biblical.)

The etymology based on biblical Amalek has strengths and weaknesses. It would account for the initial vowel (though the etymology is still unclear). But unless this was a name given to him by his enemies, it would be difficult to explain how a NEPHITE could have a name based on an Old Testament people despised by the HEBREWS. If it were given to him by the righteous NEPHITES, it would be difficult to explain why they would add the theophoric element (JH). Note however the biblical PN of a priest in the days of King DAVID, ʿbd-ʾdm Obed-Edom, which could be interpreted as “servant of EDOM,” the people who in later biblical periods, particularly in Hezekiah’s day, were despised by the Jews.

A remote possibility, though hardly plausible, is a feminine form, ʿmlqyh, Amalekiah, “Amalekitess,” which would explain all the vowels and consonants (JH).

It is possible that AMALICKIAH is related to AMALEKI, though the Book of Mormon consistently writes the latter with a “k” and the former with “ck.”[1]

If the ending is the theophoric name and the first element were somehow from the root מלך mlk, then it would have the ironic meaning “Yahweh is king” or “Yahweh rules,” borne by a man who contrived to make not God, but himself, king (JWW).

See Book of Mormon AMALEKI, AMLICI, AMULEK, MULEK, MELEK, et al.

See also Amalickiah / Ameleckiah Variant

Variants

Amaleki, Ameleckiah, Amaleckeah, Amelickiah, Amelickidh, Amalickaah, Amaleckiah, Aaalickiah, Amelickaah, Amalkiah, Ameleckiak, Amalickeah, Amellckiah, Ameleckeah, Amalichiah, Amelechiah, Amelichiah, Ammuckiah, Amalekiah

Deseret Alphabet: 𐐈𐐣𐐈𐐢𐐆𐐗𐐌𐐂 (æmælɪkaɪɑː), 𐐈𐐣𐐈𐐢𐐆𐐄𐐌𐐂 (æmælɪoʊaɪɑː)

Notes


  1. For all the variant spellings of these names see Skousen, Royal. Analysis of Textual Variants of the Book of Mormon 6 Parts. Provo, UT: FARMS, 2005. For AMALEKI see p. 1116 and for AMALICKIAH p. 2529. Also see Smith, Robert F. Critical Text Second Edition. Provo, UT: FARMS 1986-7, Appendix III, “Book of Mormon Onomasticon Variants, 1225”).
<< Amalickiah >>

Name Index

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z